H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Rodolphe Gilbert H2H: 3-0
Daniel Vacek holds a 3–0 lead over Rodolphe Gilbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Toulouse fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1999* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-2 | Rodolphe Gilbert | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1994* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(7) | Rodolphe Gilbert | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1994* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-2 | Rodolphe Gilbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rodolphe Gilbert | #1,523 | #61 | 600 | 1,709 | 67 | 115 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Rodolphe Gilbert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #92 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #127 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #148 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #208 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |