H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 0-1
Sebastien Lareau holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 1997 Hong Kong fourth round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1997* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sebastien Lareau | 6-1 7-6(3) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |