H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-1
Daniel Vacek holds a 2–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Canada Masters fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1996* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daniel Vacek | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |