H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniele Bracciali vs Martin Lee H2H: 1-0
Daniele Bracciali holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-7(6) 7-6(6) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Daniele Bracciali | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Martin Lee | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Daniele Bracciali | 4-6 6-7(6) 7-6(6) 6-2 6-2 | Martin Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniele Bracciali | #923 | #49 | 752 | 1,710 | 33 | 51 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Lee | #1,474 | #94 | 429 | 1,594 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniele Bracciali | Martin Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #950 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #203 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #304 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #258 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |