H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 0-1
Alexandr Dolgopolov holds a 1–0 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexandr Dolgopolov won the 2017 Tokyo third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2017* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-1 6-2 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |