H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Aslan Karatsev H2H: 1-2
Aslan Karatsev holds a 2–1 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Aslan Karatsev leads 2–0 on clay, while Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Aslan Karatsev won the 2023 Madrid Masters fourth round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Aslan Karatsev | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2022* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Aslan Karatsev | Match data |
| May 12, 2021* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Aslan Karatsev | 6-2 6-4 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2014 | Moscow | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Aslan Karatsev | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Aslan Karatsev | #369 | #14 | 2,633 | 1,985 | 78 | 86 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Aslan Karatsev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2022 | 17–29 | 37.0% | #59 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2024 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #287 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 |