H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Christopher O'Connell H2H: 3-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–0 lead over Christopher O'Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2023 US Open second round 6-2 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2023* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Christopher O'Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |