H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs David Goffin H2H: 3-1
Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–1 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2022 Halle third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-2 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2019* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(3) 6-4 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | David Goffin | 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 7-6(3) 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |