H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Daniil Medvedev vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 4-0

Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2020 ATP Finals round robin 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniil Medvedev
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniil Medvedev #4 6-3 6-3 Diego Schwartzman #9 Match data Nov 16, 2020 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Daniil Medvedev #5 6-3 6-1 Diego Schwartzman #9 Match data Nov 7, 2020* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Daniil Medvedev #13 6-2 6-2 Diego Schwartzman #23 Match data Jun 22, 2019* QF Queen's Club Championships ATP 500 Grass
Daniil Medvedev #32 6-4 6-4 Diego Schwartzman #14 Match data Oct 4, 2018* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniil Medvedev #8 #1 10,780 2,280 434 187 69.9% 1 6 1 5 10 23
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniil Medvedev Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2016 5–5 50.0% #99 1,685 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 2017 22–23 48.9% #65 1,739 0 0 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 2018 41–23 64.1% #16 2,033 0 3 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 2019 58–21 73.4% #5 2,126 0 7 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2020 24–9 72.7% #4 2,180 0 9 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2021 53–13 80.3% #2 2,239 1 13 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 2022 42–18 70.0% #7 2,060 1 15 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2023 67–18 78.8% #3 2,161 1 20 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2024 46–19 70.8% #5 2,090 1 20 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 2025 43–23 65.2% #13 1,950 1 21 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 2026 33–15 68.8% #8 1,885 1 23 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniil Medvedev Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2018 36 14 50 72.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2019 45 13 58 77.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2020 24 7 31 77.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2021 41 8 49 83.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2022 31 13 44 70.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2023 50 12 62 80.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — —
28 2024 29 12 41 70.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2025 31 16 47 66.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2026 22 8 30 73.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 326 120 446 73.1% 51 39 90 56.7% 57 28 85 67.1% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 609/622 of Daniil Medvedev's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniil Medvedev Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2016 10/10 5.4 2.0 59.9% 71.2% 46.0% 52.1% 43.8% 61.5% 42.0% 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 2017 45/45 7.3 4.0 60.6% 71.5% 49.0% 59.7% 42.9% 62.9% 35.4% 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 2018 63/64 6.8 3.8 57.6% 74.4% 51.1% 63.9% 41.2% 64.7% 36.9% 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 2019 79/79 8.7 3.2 59.8% 76.4% 55.9% 54.9% 45.9% 68.2% 41.2% 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2020 33/33 9.4 2.6 61.6% 79.0% 55.4% 66.1% 44.5% 70.3% 40.1% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2021 62/66 9.5 3.0 62.7% 79.2% 54.1% 59.7% 46.6% 69.7% 41.8% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 2022 60/60 9.2 4.0 64.6% 76.5% 51.3% 67.8% 47.6% 67.6% 40.6% 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2023 84/85 7.0 4.1 64.5% 76.2% 50.8% 62.5% 46.8% 67.0% 41.5% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2024 62/65 6.9 4.8 61.2% 73.1% 49.9% 57.7% 46.1% 64.3% 39.9% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 2025 64/66 8.3 4.3 62.3% 76.2% 51.4% 52.7% 38.3% 66.6% 40.6% 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 2026 47/49 7.7 4.1 65.3% 73.8% 48.4% 61.4% 43.2% 65.1% 40.9% 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
Career — 609/622 8.0 3.8 62.0% 75.6% 51.7% 60.1% 44.5% 66.6% 40.1% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniil Medvedev Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1484 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1487 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1686 125.7 -0.92 +1.52 1.091 51.8% -58 -63 — 47.8% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.68 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2017 1740 146.3 -0.73 +0.04 0.954 49.5% -69 -182 +107 48.6% -0.11 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.25 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2018 2034 157.6 +1.04 +1.47 1.046 50.9% +11 -502 -192 59.6% +0.40 13–8 (62%) 11–9 (55%) — -1.36 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75
23 2019 2127 174.7 +4.17 +5.57 1.295 54.1% +39 -430 -272 70.3% +1.22 9–11 (45%) 23–10 (70%) — -0.18 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35
24 2020 2180 169.6 +6.03 +3.69 1.347 54.2% +45 — — 67.0% +1.30 7–3 (70%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.98 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94
25 2021 2239 172.8 +6.07 +5.71 1.378 55.1% +60 -456 -284 73.4% +1.60 13–5 (72%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.39 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44
26 2022 2061 170.2 +3.94 +4.83 1.253 54.0% +76 -213 -40 70.9% +1.29 3–9 (25%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.62 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19
27 2023 2162 177.0 +4.02 +6.16 1.258 54.0% +62 -194 -88 71.4% +1.44 14–6 (70%) 16–15 (52%) — -3.49 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52
28 2024 2091 167.2 +1.18 +4.88 1.118 52.0% +49 -130 +43 64.1% +0.74 11–4 (73%) 20–8 (71%) — -1.43 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93
29 2025 1951 157.6 +2.07 +4.31 1.216 53.1% +40 -8 +114 60.6% +0.85 14–12 (54%) 14–16 (47%) — +3.07 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52
30 2026 1885 156.4 +0.78 +4.95 1.172 52.8% +120 +15 +122 63.9% +1.01 8–7 (53%) 6–13 (32%) — +1.68 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
Career — 2280 170.5 +2.86 +4.34 1.200 53.1% +44 -213 -48 65.6% +1.01 104–74 (58%) 132–106 (55%) 101.1 -0.61 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.