H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Gilles Simon H2H: 1-3
Gilles Simon holds a 3–1 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2022 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 7-5 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2020* | Marseille | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-4 6-0 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2019* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Gilles Simon | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| May 25, 2017* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gilles Simon | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |