H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Ilya Ivashka H2H: 4-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Ilya Ivashka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2023 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2023* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2022* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2022* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2021* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-5 6-4 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Ilya Ivashka | #791 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,951 | 78 | 83 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Ilya Ivashka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #48 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |