H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Jack Sock H2H: 2-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 2–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2018 Canada Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2018* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 7-5 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |