H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Milos Raonic H2H: 3-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–0 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2020 Paris Masters semifinal 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2020* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 7-6(4) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2019* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2018* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |