H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 0-1
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Daniil Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 3-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-2 3-6 2-6 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |