H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Ze Zhang H2H: 1-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 1–0 lead over Ze Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2018 Shanghai Masters second round 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Ze Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Ze Zhang | #1,385 | #148 | 374 | 1,586 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daniil Medvedev | Ze Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |