H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Darian King vs Ti Chen

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Darian King vs Ti Chen.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Darian King
Barbados Age 34 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Ti Chen
TPE Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Darian King #255 1-6 6-4 10-8 Ti Chen #226 Match data Jun 27, 2016 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Darian King #1,217 #106 523 1,699 3 10 23.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ti Chen #1,433 #184 270 1,526 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Darian King Ti Chen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #332 1,454 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #316 1,435 0 0
23 2015 0–1 0.0% #226 1,488 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
24 2016 0–1 0.0% #152 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2017 3–4 42.9% #173 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2018 0–2 0.0% #198 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2019 0–1 0.0% #166 1,569 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2023 0–1 0.0% #515 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Darian King Ti Chen
Yr Hard Yr Hard
W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — —
25 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — —
26 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — —
27 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — —
31 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — —
Career — 3 10 13 23.1% — 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Darian King Ti Chen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 1.0 1.0 63.6% 54.3% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 52.7% 34.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 50.0% 31.6% 28.6% 0.0% 42.9% 27.5%
23 2015 1/1 1.0 3.0 72.1% 41.9% 50.0% 44.4% 50.0% 44.2% 24.4% 2007 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.2% 64.1% 40.0% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 28.3%
25 2017 7/7 1.9 2.0 61.1% 58.5% 51.6% 52.8% 43.9% 56.1% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.1% 58.0% 42.9% 56.3% 19.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 57.9% 57.6% 58.3% 0.0% 12.5% 57.9% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1/1 1.0 0.0 82.9% 55.2% 50.0% 45.5% 36.4% 54.3% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12/13 1.5 2.1 64.6% 56.7% 50.5% 47.7% 37.1% 54.5% 37.4% — 3/3 1.3 1.3 65.7% 56.1% 40.5% 29.0% 33.3% 51.0% 30.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Darian King Ti Chen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2012 1486 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1455 95.8 -1.39 -0.30 0.731 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.04
22 2014 1469 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1436 92.0 -1.13 -2.15 0.481 36.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21
23 2015 1488 105.1 -3.89 -3.78 0.437 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2007 1482 107.1 +2.38 +1.68 0.664 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.19
24 2016 1476 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05 2008 1465 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 1679 131.5 -2.65 +1.11 0.880 47.4% +43 — — 43.8% -1.13 0–1 1–1 — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 1567 101.1 -2.54 -1.91 0.787 44.8% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.43 2010 1450 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1570 115.6 -3.08 -2.67 0.874 45.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 2011 1463 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1553 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1439 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1512 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1420 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1530 100.6 +0.02 -0.41 0.934 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2015 1389 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1365 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1384 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1700 115.8 -2.55 -0.24 0.822 45.8% +43 — — 27.6% -1.76 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.15 — 1527 96.7 -0.05 -0.26 0.615 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.