H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
David Carter vs Steve Krulevitz H2H: 1-1
David Carter and Steve Krulevitz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Carter leads 1–0 on clay, while Steve Krulevitz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Carter won the 1981 Mexico City semifinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1981* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Carter | 6-1 7-5 | Steve Krulevitz | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1980* | Tulsa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Krulevitz | 6-3 6-1 | David Carter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Carter | #606 | #78 | 0 | 1,729 | 76 | 119 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Krulevitz | #602 | #70 | 0 | 1,765 | 122 | 202 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Carter | Steve Krulevitz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #373 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #236 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #234 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #91 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #145 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #131 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #95 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #190 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #152 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #82 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |