H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Ferrer vs Alex Corretja H2H: 0-3
Alex Corretja holds a 3–0 lead over David Ferrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2005 Costa Do Sauipe third round 0-6 7-5 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 0-6 7-5 (ret.) | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2004* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-5 6-1 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-5 | David Ferrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |