H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 2-0

David Ferrer holds a 2–0 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2016 Rome Masters second round 4-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Filippo Volandri
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Ferrer #9 4-6 7-5 6-1 Filippo Volandri #203 Match data
Jul 14, 2007* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay David Ferrer #15 6-2 6-1 Filippo Volandri #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Filippo Volandri #1,074 #25 1,140 1,840 167 215 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Filippo Volandri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #213 1,474 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2002 0–2 0.0% #153 1,448 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2003 18–16 52.9% #47 1,637 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2004 29–21 58.0% #43 1,723 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2005 27–27 50.0% #38 1,682 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2006 30–24 55.6% #38 1,711 0 2
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2007 20–25 44.4% #40 1,682 0 2
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2008 10–20 33.3% #102 1,529 0 2
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2009 0–3 0.0% #215 1,562 0 2
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2010 3–6 33.3% #91 1,610 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2011 13–19 40.6% #69 1,666 0 2
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2012 11–21 34.4% #88 1,609 0 2
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2013 5–11 31.2% #71 1,604 0 2
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2014 1–16 5.9% #212 1,477 0 2
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 — — — — — — —
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2016 0–2 0.0% #267 1,548 0 2
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 — — — — — — —
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —