H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 7-2

David Ferrer holds a 7–2 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2015 US Open third round 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 6-1.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #27 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 6-1 David Ferrer #7 Match data
Apr 16, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Ferrer #6 6-3 6-0 Jeremy Chardy #48 Match data
Feb 20, 2014* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay David Ferrer #4 6-2 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #45 Match data
Jan 19, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard David Ferrer #3 6-2 7-6(5) 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #31 Match data
Jun 27, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass David Ferrer #11 7-5 6-3 4-6 3-6 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #55 Match data
May 11, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Ferrer #12 6-3 7-6(2) Jeremy Chardy #44 Match data
Mar 17, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #12 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #48 Match data
Feb 7, 2009* Johannesburg ATP 250 SF Hard Jeremy Chardy #61 1-6 7-6(9) 7-6(4) David Ferrer #13 Match data
Jun 2, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay David Ferrer #15 6-1 6-4 3-6 6-1 Jeremy Chardy #455 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27