H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Ferrer vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 6-2

David Ferrer holds a 6–2 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 4–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2013 Miami Masters quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 29, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard David Ferrer #5 4-6 6-3 6-0 Jurgen Melzer #42 Match data
Apr 23, 2011* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay David Ferrer #6 6-3 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #8 Match data
Apr 16, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay David Ferrer #6 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #9 Match data
Nov 12, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #12 7-6(6) 2-6 6-3 David Ferrer #7 Match data
May 30, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #27 6-4 6-0 7-6(1) David Ferrer #11 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #14 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #32 Match data
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Ferrer #65 6-2 6-2 7-6(2) Jurgen Melzer #92 Match data
Sep 13, 2002* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay David Ferrer #81 6-4 7-6(6) Jurgen Melzer #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5