H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Ferrer vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 4-0
David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-3 6-1 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2013* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-1 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 6-1 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2007* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |