H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Ferrer vs Milos Raonic H2H: 4-0
David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2012 Barcelona semifinal 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2011* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 7-6(7) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | David Ferrer | 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Ferrer | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |