H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Ferrer vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 4-0

David Ferrer holds a 4–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2016 Beijing third round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2016* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard David Ferrer #13 6-4 7-6(3) Pablo Cuevas #19 Match data
Feb 13, 2016* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #6 6-4 1-6 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #35 Match data
Jul 17, 2010* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #12 6-3 6-3 Pablo Cuevas #64 Match data
Feb 26, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 QF Clay David Ferrer #17 7-5 6-4 Pablo Cuevas #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27 — — — — — — —