H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Ferrer vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-1

David Ferrer and Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Roland Garros round of 32 7-6(4) 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #79 7-6(4) 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #15 Match data Jun 4, 2006* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Ferrer #72 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #84 Match data Aug 2, 2003* SF Sopot ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,263 703 371 65.5% 0 1 0 10 16 27
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #1,153 #50 826 1,704 68 133 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Ferrer Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,671 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,654 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,777 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #154 1,491 0 0
24 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,816 0 2 2002 0–3 0.0% #141 1,496 0 0
25 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,038 0 5 2003 5–11 31.2% #80 1,477 0 0
26 2008 40–21 65.6% #12 1,837 0 7 2004 7–19 26.9% #130 1,448 0 0
27 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,871 0 7 2005 5–5 50.0% #120 1,499 0 0
28 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,035 0 9 2006 25–20 55.6% #57 1,665 0 0
29 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,109 0 11 2007 9–18 33.3% #133 1,546 0 0
30 2012 70–15 82.4% #5 2,228 0 18 2008 1–6 14.3% #121 1,569 0 0
31 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,092 0 20 2009 4–10 28.6% #156 1,584 0 0
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,060 0 21 2010 1–4 20.0% #77 1,571 0 0
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,127 0 26 2011 5–15 25.0% #130 1,532 0 0
34 2016 34–23 59.6% #21 1,961 0 26 2012 3–12 20.0% #91 1,571 0 0
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,907 0 27 2013 2–6 25.0% #166 1,567 0 0
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,708 0 27 2014 0–3 0.0% #224 1,620 0 0
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,803 0 27 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Ferrer Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 6 10 16 37.5% 13 16 29 44.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 3 10 13 23.1% 22 15 37 59.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 16 11 27 59.3% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 37 14 51 72.5% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 15 14 29 51.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 22 14 36 61.1% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 26 15 41 63.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2011 30 12 42 71.4% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 31 8 39 79.5% 28 5 33 84.8% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2014 29 15 44 65.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2019 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 341 199 540 63.1% 311 137 448 69.4% 44 26 70 62.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — 7 29 36 19.4% 61 94 155 39.4% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,056/1,074 of David Ferrer's and 192/196 of Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Ferrer Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2002 15/16 1.1 2.9 60.6% 66.6% 52.3% 44.8% 46.2% 60.7% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 45/47 2.0 3.8 59.2% 63.2% 46.7% 53.8% 44.3% 56.4% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 60/60 2.5 2.7 63.1% 64.2% 49.4% 56.1% 44.4% 58.3% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 68/69 2.5 2.6 64.1% 65.3% 51.4% 54.6% 48.0% 60.5% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 61/61 2.5 3.0 63.5% 66.0% 49.4% 52.9% 47.3% 59.9% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 79/79 2.9 1.7 65.4% 69.1% 53.5% 57.6% 52.1% 63.7% 44.3% 2003 16/16 4.5 3.1 60.8% 67.7% 46.4% 48.6% 50.7% 59.1% 39.0%
26 2008 60/61 2.7 1.6 66.1% 69.0% 54.5% 55.7% 43.0% 64.2% 41.9% 2004 25/26 2.2 3.6 57.9% 66.1% 46.0% 58.2% 34.5% 57.6% 33.6%
27 2009 62/64 3.1 2.9 61.2% 70.2% 52.9% 58.9% 49.4% 63.4% 42.7% 2005 10/10 1.8 1.6 61.2% 66.2% 52.9% 44.7% 42.7% 61.5% 38.1%
28 2010 81/81 3.0 1.7 65.1% 70.7% 56.5% 63.9% 48.7% 65.7% 43.1% 2006 44/45 4.2 2.4 59.1% 70.0% 46.7% 56.8% 45.3% 60.5% 38.8%
29 2011 74/74 3.6 2.7 60.7% 72.9% 56.8% 65.7% 48.1% 66.6% 42.8% 2007 25/27 2.9 4.9 55.2% 65.2% 43.6% 52.4% 60.3% 55.5% 38.3%
30 2012 82/85 3.3 2.1 63.4% 73.9% 57.8% 65.2% 48.2% 68.0% 42.7% 2008 7/7 1.7 4.6 53.1% 66.9% 43.3% 51.5% 40.4% 55.7% 39.0%
31 2013 84/87 3.2 2.3 62.9% 70.4% 53.4% 57.1% 44.8% 64.2% 42.6% 2009 14/14 2.4 5.1 55.3% 67.0% 45.5% 62.4% 38.6% 57.2% 36.2%
32 2014 78/79 2.2 2.5 62.9% 69.9% 53.7% 61.3% 43.8% 63.8% 43.3% 2010 5/5 3.4 3.2 58.2% 68.7% 41.4% 48.3% 29.2% 57.3% 33.3%
33 2015 69/69 2.2 2.9 62.4% 70.5% 54.2% 60.3% 47.6% 64.4% 43.6% 2011 20/20 2.5 4.4 55.9% 63.8% 44.8% 53.5% 47.8% 55.3% 35.6%
34 2016 54/57 2.8 3.2 61.3% 70.5% 53.7% 63.4% 43.6% 63.8% 40.3% 2012 15/15 2.7 5.2 53.7% 66.8% 46.2% 49.3% 37.1% 57.2% 35.0%
35 2017 45/46 2.6 4.6 59.1% 70.6% 50.9% 61.7% 39.6% 62.4% 39.6% 2013 8/8 4.3 4.1 53.9% 71.8% 47.5% 61.8% 36.2% 60.3% 34.2%
36 2018 25/25 2.0 3.8 60.7% 66.1% 49.2% 57.7% 36.2% 59.1% 39.5% 2014 3/3 0.7 3.7 50.9% 60.3% 45.5% 47.8% 47.2% 53.6% 34.5%
37 2019 14/14 1.6 2.8 64.7% 67.0% 55.6% 54.9% 39.1% 62.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,056/1,074 2.7 2.6 62.8% 69.2% 53.3% 59.2% 46.2% 63.2% 42.3% — 192/201 3.1 3.7 57.1% 67.1% 45.9% 54.2% 44.4% 58.0% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Ferrer Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2002 1611 129.0 -0.14 +2.61 1.094 51.9% — +85 — 59.5% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1672 133.1 -4.21 +1.79 0.902 48.2% -135 +48 — 40.5% -0.84 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -2.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1655 133.7 -3.20 +2.62 0.972 49.4% -121 +132 -112 46.3% -0.23 13–7 (65%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.43 2000 1482 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1777 152.3 -0.65 +4.57 1.071 51.2% -27 +72 — 58.3% +0.68 11–12 (48%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.45 2001 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.09
24 2006 1816 148.0 -1.48 +4.87 1.055 51.0% -62 +114 -166 57.8% +0.52 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.00 2002 1497 110.2 — — — — — +38 — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — -0.52
25 2007 2038 165.7 +0.90 +7.85 1.222 53.9% +1 -58 — 66.5% +1.31 12–4 (75%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.11 2003 1478 114.0 -1.75 -0.48 0.954 48.8% -2 +54 — 40.5% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.83
26 2008 1838 152.2 +1.24 +4.88 1.168 52.6% -35 +228 -34 60.9% +0.75 10–6 (63%) 11–8 (58%) — +2.27 2004 1448 112.1 -4.06 -3.50 0.792 46.1% -24 +58 — 33.8% -1.28 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.77
27 2009 1871 159.3 +0.54 +5.75 1.169 52.8% +17 +139 -50 59.8% +0.90 14–10 (58%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.88 2005 1500 117.9 -0.46 -0.04 0.991 49.6% — +55 — 50.0% +0.05 — 1–0 — -0.16
28 2010 2036 167.1 +2.99 +6.37 1.257 54.2% -69 +114 -169 67.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–9 (55%) — +0.59 2006 1665 136.3 -0.89 +0.15 0.983 50.1% -205 +93 — 51.8% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.23
29 2011 2109 173.9 +4.03 +6.13 1.283 54.5% +5 +84 -191 69.8% +1.52 12–7 (63%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.39 2007 1546 122.6 -4.46 +0.12 0.860 47.2% -108 +96 — 38.8% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.16
30 2012 2229 173.7 +4.91 +6.11 1.332 55.1% -6 +114 -152 75.9% +1.67 14–1 (93%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.07 2008 1570 121.0 -2.71 +1.08 0.881 47.6% — +67 — 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
31 2013 2093 174.2 +1.94 +6.08 1.191 53.3% +31 +273 -20 64.6% +1.16 20–8 (71%) 12–9 (57%) — +1.12 2009 1585 117.3 -3.43 -1.01 0.847 47.1% -183 +83 — 33.3% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.21
32 2014 2060 172.8 +1.07 +6.87 1.198 53.5% +10 +218 — 65.5% +1.12 15–11 (58%) 17–12 (59%) — +2.77 2010 1571 118.8 -1.59 -2.39 0.781 46.7% — +106 — 18.2% -1.27 — 0–2 — -0.10
33 2015 2127 174.9 +1.19 +7.08 1.223 53.6% +32 +170 — 67.6% +1.31 15–2 (88%) 12–10 (55%) — +3.35 2011 1532 118.2 -5.08 -1.56 0.798 46.2% -132 +68 — 31.4% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.81
34 2016 1961 160.9 -0.03 +3.83 1.112 51.7% +65 +185 -21 57.1% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.83 2012 1571 127.4 -3.34 -2.07 0.818 46.7% -103 +25 -145 27.5% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.46
35 2017 1907 153.4 -0.46 +2.91 1.054 50.7% +10 +112 -23 49.2% +0.13 12–6 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.54 2013 1568 119.9 -1.67 -1.61 0.864 47.7% — +36 — 38.9% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.50
36 2018 1708 138.6 -2.32 +3.21 0.966 49.2% +118 +153 +130 41.7% -0.43 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.57 2014 1620 118.9 -2.17 -1.23 0.744 44.3% — +60 — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — 0.00
37 2019 1804 151.4 -0.33 +3.86 1.116 51.9% +47 +91 — 60.0% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.85 2015 1603 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1605 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1528 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2264 167.8 +0.80 +5.33 1.149 52.6% -5 +126 -81 61.4% +0.85 194–111 (64%) 158–153 (51%) 102.5 +1.46 — 1705 127.1 -2.77 -0.95 0.877 47.8% -121 +72 -145 38.5% -0.80 19–41 (32%) 29–35 (45%) 92.4 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.