H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 1-2
Bernard Tomic holds a 2–1 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while David Goffin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2016 Cincinnati Masters third round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2013* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-1 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | David Goffin | 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |