H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Go Soeda H2H: 1-0
David Goffin holds a 1–0 lead over Go Soeda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Goffin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2015 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 6-2 | Go Soeda | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2011* | Chennai | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-3 6-4 | Go Soeda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |