H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-1
David Goffin and Ivan Dodig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on clay, while David Goffin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2017 Umag quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2017* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ivan Dodig | 7-5 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2014* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | David Goffin | 7-6(0) 6-4 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2012 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-2 6-2 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |