H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
David Goffin vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 1-1
David Goffin and Jarkko Nieminen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2014 Winston-Salem fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2014* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2013* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-0 6-0 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Jarkko Nieminen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |