H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

David Goffin vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 3-3

David Goffin and Nicolas Almagro are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Goffin leads 2–1 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2017 Metz fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Goffin
Belgium Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 2017* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard David Goffin #12 3-6 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #131 Match data
Apr 19, 2017* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Goffin #13 7-5 6-1 Nicolas Almagro #57 Match data
May 28, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay David Goffin #13 6-2 4-6 6-3 4-6 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #49 Match data
Apr 16, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nicolas Almagro #12 2-6 6-1 6-3 David Goffin #64 Match data
Mar 25, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 6-3 6-4 David Goffin #47 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 6-4 6-2 David Goffin #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Goffin #251 #7 3,775 2,099 325 264 55.2% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Goffin Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2011 2–2 50.0% #174 1,591 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2012 14–13 51.9% #46 1,789 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2013 10–21 32.3% #110 1,749 0 0 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2014 22–14 61.1% #22 1,970 0 2 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2015 34–24 58.6% #16 1,984 0 2 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2016 44–24 64.7% #11 2,020 0 2 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2017 53–24 68.8% #7 2,061 0 4 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2018 27–16 62.8% #22 2,024 0 4 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2019 36–26 58.1% #11 1,986 0 4 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2020 9–10 47.4% #15 1,862 0 4 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2021 14–15 48.3% #39 1,745 0 5 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2022 23–25 47.9% #53 1,759 0 6 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2023 9–12 42.9% #111 1,710 0 6 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2024 17–16 51.5% #52 1,825 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2025 11–22 33.3% #119 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —