H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 3-1
David Goffin holds a 3–1 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while David Goffin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2022 Marrakech fourth round 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Goffin | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 6-1 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2012* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-2 6-2 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Pablo Andujar | 7-6(2) 6-4 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |