H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-0
David Goffin holds a 3–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Goffin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2017 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | David Goffin | 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2016* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | David Goffin | 4-6 7-5 2-0 (ret.) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Goffin | 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Goffin | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |