H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Goffin vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 2-1
David Goffin holds a 2–1 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Goffin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2015 US Open first round 6-4 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
| May 1, 2015* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Goffin | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-1 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Simone Bolelli | 6-3 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Simone Bolelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |