H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Taro Daniel H2H: 0-1
Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2022 Dubai third round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2022* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-3 7-6(5) | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |