H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 3-1
David Goffin holds a 3–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Goffin leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2017 Rome Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2017* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Goffin | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2016* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2015* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Goffin | 6-4 6-2 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2013* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(5) 6-2 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |