H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
David Goffin vs Tommy Haas H2H: 0-1
Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Canada Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2013* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-6(4) 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Goffin | Tommy Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |