H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Albert Montanes H2H: 4-1

David Nalbandian holds a 4–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2010 Buenos Aires quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2010* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Montanes #30 (w/o) David Nalbandian #140 Match data
Oct 23, 2008* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-2 Albert Montanes #47 Match data
Oct 11, 2008* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard David Nalbandian #7 6-4 6-1 Albert Montanes #51 Match data
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Nalbandian #8 6-4 6-3 3-6 7-5 Albert Montanes #104 Match data
Feb 21, 2002* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #48 6-2 6-4 Albert Montanes #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6