H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Andreas Beck H2H: 1-0

David Nalbandian holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Beck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Nalbandian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2010 Monte-Carlo Masters first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Andreas Beck
GER Age 40 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #151 6-3 6-1 Andreas Beck #55 Match data Apr 13, 2010* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Andreas Beck #1,283 #33 1,115 1,756 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Beck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #336 1,508 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #286 1,520 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2006 0–2 0.0% #233 1,481 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #209 1,505 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 2008 5–7 41.7% #109 1,627 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 2009 22–20 52.4% #39 1,708 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 2010 7–14 33.3% #154 1,646 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 2011 0–4 0.0% #98 1,642 0 0
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 2012 2–6 25.0% #446 1,622 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 2013 0–2 0.0% #186 1,648 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 2014 0–3 0.0% #116 1,660 0 0
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 2015 0–1 0.0% #387 1,607 0 0
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 2016 0–1 0.0% #364 1,615 0 0
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Beck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2009 9 11 20 45.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 14 24 38 36.8% 17 32 49 34.7% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 100/101 of Andreas Beck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Beck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% 2004 2/2 0.5 2.0 61.0% 62.4% 51.3% 0.0% 26.5% 58.0% 42.7%
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% 2005 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.2% 59.9% 59.2% 35.7% 33.9% 59.8% 35.8%
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% 2006 2/2 3.5 6.5 60.5% 58.9% 55.5% 54.2% 46.0% 57.8% 37.5%
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% 2007 1/1 2.0 6.0 66.7% 63.2% 52.9% 45.5% 42.9% 59.8% 34.9%
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 2008 12/12 7.9 5.3 61.1% 73.7% 52.3% 70.5% 42.7% 65.0% 30.4%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 2009 42/42 5.2 4.2 59.2% 73.3% 53.4% 65.3% 34.1% 64.8% 36.7%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 2010 21/21 3.6 5.4 57.3% 69.1% 51.5% 57.0% 40.3% 61.4% 33.0%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 2011 4/4 2.0 1.0 64.7% 62.7% 53.5% 43.5% 4.2% 59.4% 27.2%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 2012 7/8 2.0 2.7 58.3% 58.0% 44.3% 46.4% 29.3% 52.9% 29.4%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 2013 2/2 4.0 5.5 53.2% 63.4% 48.8% 64.1% 37.2% 56.5% 34.8%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 2014 3/3 2.3 5.0 60.0% 57.9% 41.6% 54.4% 57.1% 52.0% 33.1%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2015 1/1 7.0 4.0 56.2% 70.7% 65.6% 0.0% 40.0% 68.5% 28.0%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.3% 51.5% 30.0% 44.4% 50.0% 43.4% 34.5%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 100/101 4.5 4.4 59.2% 69.2% 51.8% 58.5% 36.1% 61.9% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Andreas Beck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 2004 1508 105.4 +0.07 -0.10 1.016 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.04
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.30 2005 1520 108.7 +1.85 -1.03 0.891 48.5% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.03
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.80 2006 1482 102.2 +1.46 -0.28 0.889 48.1% — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.16
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.37 2007 1505 107.7 -0.73 -0.46 0.868 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.15
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.96 2008 1627 117.3 +0.69 -2.92 0.867 48.6% -27 -118 +30 44.1% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.26
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.79 2009 1708 137.1 +0.90 -0.74 1.043 50.5% -47 +4 -58 49.1% +0.02 9–4 (69%) 12–10 (55%) — +2.03
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.24 2010 1646 125.7 -1.42 -2.64 0.855 47.8% -13 -8 +35 40.4% -0.60 2–5 (29%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.20
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 2011 1643 110.7 -0.84 -1.54 0.670 43.4% — -36 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.48
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) — +1.15 2012 1622 112.1 -3.92 -3.25 0.624 42.1% -4 — — 43.8% -0.94 0–2 1–0 — +0.21
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35 2013 1649 113.4 +0.94 -2.27 0.801 45.6% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.26
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13 2014 1660 112.8 -2.60 -2.37 0.688 42.9% — — — 11.1% -2.56 — 0–1 — -0.25
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.83 2015 1607 112.5 -0.11 -2.14 0.889 48.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.07
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.55 2016 1615 106.0 -3.50 -3.31 0.609 38.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1757 127.8 -0.18 -1.71 0.896 48.2% -32 -17 +5 41.2% -0.51 14–19 (42%) 25–24 (51%) 97.6 +1.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.