H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
David Nalbandian vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 1-2
Filippo Volandri holds a 2–1 lead over David Nalbandian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Filippo Volandri leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Filippo Volandri won the 2012 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2012* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Filippo Volandri | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | David Nalbandian | Match data |
| May 8, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | David Nalbandian | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2003* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Filippo Volandri | 6-2 7-6(6) | David Nalbandian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Nalbandian | #231 | #3 | 3,500 | 2,070 | 356 | 185 | 65.8% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Nalbandian | Filippo Volandri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #47 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,988 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #6 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #9 | 2,032 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #11 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #64 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #27 | 2,005 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #64 | 1,940 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #82 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #229 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |