H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 3-0

David Nalbandian holds a 3–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2002 Madrid Open round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #18 6-1 6-1 Francisco Clavet #106 Match data Oct 16, 2002* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Nalbandian #47 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #85 Match data Apr 11, 2002* R32 Estoril Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
David Nalbandian #45 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #50 Match data Jan 11, 2002* R16 ASB Classic ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1
26 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7
30 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Nalbandian Francisco Clavet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7% — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/545 of David Nalbandian's and 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Nalbandian Francisco Clavet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3% 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6%
23 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9% 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4%
24 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4% 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8%
25 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7% 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5%
26 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2% 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2%
27 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3% 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1%
28 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4% 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3%
29 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3% 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0%
30 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7% 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8%
31 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8% 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8%
Career — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5% — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Nalbandian Francisco Clavet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84
20 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 +0.79
21 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) 103.7 +0.01
22 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) 102.6 +1.58
23 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -68 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) 104.1 -1.12
24 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 96.6 -0.19
25 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) 102.2 -0.48
26 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) 96.0 +0.51
27 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) 100.7 -1.96
28 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) 104.1 -1.22
29 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) 93.7 +2.29
30 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) 97.7 -2.18
31 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) 97.4 -2.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) 95.2 +0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 97.8 -0.77
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23
Career — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43 — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.