H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 3-0

David Nalbandian holds a 3–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2002 Madrid Masters second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard David Nalbandian #18 6-1 6-1 Francisco Clavet #106 Match data
Apr 11, 2002* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay David Nalbandian #47 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #85 Match data
Jan 11, 2002* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard David Nalbandian #45 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8