H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-1

David Nalbandian and Frank Dancevic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2008 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Frank Dancevic #95 6-4 6-2 6-4 David Nalbandian #7 Match data
Jun 28, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass David Nalbandian #25 6-2 6-3 5-7 6-3 Frank Dancevic #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,773 54 89 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #434 1,505 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,473 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,558 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2008 6–10 37.5% #130 1,660 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,700 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,664 0 0
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,605 0 0
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,688 0 0
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,662 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0