H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

David Nalbandian vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-1

David Nalbandian and Jurgen Melzer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jurgen Melzer #28 6-4 6-1 David Nalbandian #139 Match data
Oct 20, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #9 7-6(1) 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Nalbandian Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5