H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Pate vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 0-3
Tim Wilkison holds a 3–0 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Wilkison leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1988 San Francisco fourth round 2-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1988* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tim Wilkison | 2-6 7-6 6-3 | David Pate | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1987* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 6-4 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1986* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Tim Wilkison | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Pate | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |