H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-2

Adrian Voinea holds a 2–1 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adrian Voinea leads 2–0 on clay, while David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 1999 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Adrian Voinea
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Voinea #75 6-3 6-2 David Prinosil #78 Match data May 5, 1999* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
David Prinosil #78 7-6(0) 4-6 6-2 Adrian Voinea #71 Match data Jan 7, 1999* R32 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Adrian Voinea #42 6-4 6-3 David Prinosil #41 Match data May 8, 1996* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Adrian Voinea #1,046 #36 957 1,755 126 168 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Adrian Voinea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 1994 2–4 33.3% #202 1,492 0 0
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 1995 13–19 40.6% #56 1,567 0 0
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 1996 28–25 52.8% #45 1,709 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 1997 12–20 37.5% #139 1,629 0 0
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 1998 11–9 55.0% #71 1,675 0 0
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 1999 14–21 40.0% #100 1,650 0 1
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 2000 9–20 31.0% #110 1,552 0 1
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 2001 11–11 50.0% #97 1,625 0 1
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 2002 18–20 47.4% #68 1,635 0 1
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 2003 8–19 29.6% #154 1,531 0 1
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Adrian Voinea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1998 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 47 61 108 43.5% 65 75 140 46.4% 5 14 19 26.3% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/375 of David Prinosil's and 259/294 of Adrian Voinea's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Prinosil Adrian Voinea
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8% 1994 5/6 2.0 0.6 66.1% 60.2% 41.2% 41.5% 51.4% 53.7% 43.2%
20 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8% 1995 28/32 5.8 3.0 59.0% 67.6% 51.2% 59.1% 44.9% 60.9% 37.4%
21 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1% 1996 46/53 5.2 2.9 58.6% 68.6% 50.9% 57.9% 40.5% 61.3% 36.8%
22 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1% 1997 30/32 5.9 3.4 56.9% 64.2% 45.8% 47.6% 40.5% 56.2% 38.0%
23 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6% 1998 16/20 4.8 2.4 56.2% 67.6% 53.3% 60.5% 52.9% 61.4% 36.2%
24 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0% 1999 31/35 5.5 3.1 53.9% 69.8% 49.1% 49.1% 46.5% 60.0% 37.7%
25 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7% 2000 25/29 6.1 3.4 58.8% 69.5% 45.7% 51.9% 36.5% 59.7% 33.6%
26 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1% 2001 20/22 4.6 3.1 53.8% 70.6% 49.8% 50.7% 42.8% 61.4% 38.4%
27 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4% 2002 32/38 6.2 4.2 54.9% 69.6% 50.0% 54.7% 34.0% 60.6% 36.5%
28 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3% 2003 26/27 5.6 3.8 56.6% 68.5% 46.9% 50.4% 49.2% 58.9% 33.1%
29 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6% — 259/294 5.5 3.2 56.9% 68.3% 49.0% 53.3% 42.5% 59.9% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Adrian Voinea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25 1994 1493 101.4 -1.67 -1.23 0.933 48.4% — +28 — 33.3% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.43
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64 1995 1567 132.5 -0.38 -0.66 0.956 49.2% -80 +132 — 46.5% -0.26 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.33
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 1996 1710 138.7 -0.34 -0.30 0.952 49.5% -44 +61 -144 54.8% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.48
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15 1997 1629 126.5 -4.51 +0.39 0.866 47.2% +72 +45 -86 35.9% -0.96 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.87
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73 1998 1675 130.7 -0.22 -0.64 0.938 49.0% +39 +25 — 51.1% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03 1999 1651 125.5 -1.16 -0.03 0.943 48.8% -39 +66 — 43.6% -0.42 8–11 (42%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.55
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31 2000 1553 120.2 -1.75 -2.79 0.834 46.7% +49 +58 — 34.3% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.04
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22 2001 1625 126.7 -0.04 -0.19 0.995 49.0% -8 +38 — 43.5% -0.44 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.45
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01 2002 1636 128.1 -1.48 -0.75 0.926 48.6% +17 +4 -151 47.2% -0.24 8–5 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.15
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97 2003 1531 117.5 -3.51 -2.55 0.805 46.6% +84 +19 — 37.9% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.56
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1495 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1756 133.6 -1.52 -0.78 0.913 48.4% +4 +53 -131 44.5% -0.43 43–49 (47%) 63–54 (54%) 104.1 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.