H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

David Prinosil vs Johan Van Herck H2H: 1-0

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Johan Van Herck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1998 Australian Open round of 128 3-6 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Johan Van Herck
BEL Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #95 3-6 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 6-1 Johan Van Herck Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Johan Van Herck — — — 1,662 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Prinosil Johan Van Herck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Prinosil Johan Van Herck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
23 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1998 0 7 7 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9% — 12 25 37 32.4% 22 25 47 46.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Prinosil Johan Van Herck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 102.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.06
19 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25 1993 1492 110.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.20
20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64 1994 1502 120.0 — — — — +20 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.38
21 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54 1995 1506 105.8 — — — — +29 +8 — 33.3% -0.90 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.48
22 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15 1996 1598 121.9 — — — — -12 -12 — 44.2% -0.64 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.4 +0.80
23 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73 1997 1632 127.8 — — — — -26 -9 — 44.3% -0.41 3–5 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 99.7 -1.24
24 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03 1998 1523 114.8 — — — — +24 +65 — 41.4% -0.67 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.5 +0.49
25 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31 1999 1536 113.2 — — — — — +46 — 47.1% -0.29 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16
26 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22 2000 1554 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67 — 1662 125.2 — — — — -1 +17 — 41.6% -0.63 10–20 (33%) 20–22 (48%) 95.0 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.