H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Prinosil vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 1-1
David Prinosil and Stefano Pescosolido are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1998 Hong Kong third round 6-7(7) 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1998* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-7(7) 6-0 6-1 | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1995* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Stefano Pescosolido | 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Prinosil | Stefano Pescosolido | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 |