H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Rikl vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-0
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Roig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1992 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1992* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Rikl | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |