David Sanchez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 23, 2005 | H2H |
| Jose Acasuso | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Christophe Rochus | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
David Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2004 Dutch Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sanchez | 6-4 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data | Jul 15, 2004* | R32 | Dutch Open | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,719 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,346 | #57 | 810 | 1,783 | 19 | 59 | 24.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | David Sanchez | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #174 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | David Sanchez | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 35 | 44 | 20.5% | 78 | 77 | 155 | 50.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | 11 | 33 | 44 | 25.0% | 4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/206 of David Sanchez's and 78/78 of Michal Przysiezny's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | David Sanchez | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 1997 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 50.9% | 55.2% | 53.6% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 54.4% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 71.0% | 54.8% | 38.7% | 57.1% | 62.5% | 50.4% | 33.2% | 2004 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 57.9% | 68.1% | 40.4% | 47.8% | 65.0% | 56.8% | 33.7% |
| 21 | 1999 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 74.0% | 57.4% | 31.6% | 58.3% | 27.3% | 50.7% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8/8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 63.0% | 61.9% | 50.6% | 62.9% | 51.2% | 57.8% | 47.0% | 2006 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 56.7% | 61.0% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 33.8% | 57.3% | 42.3% |
| 23 | 2001 | 28/31 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 63.4% | 63.8% | 48.8% | 56.3% | 47.9% | 58.0% | 39.9% | 2007 | 4/4 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 59.0% | 68.4% | 40.8% | 60.0% | 34.4% | 56.7% | 36.4% |
| 24 | 2002 | 36/42 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 62.2% | 68.3% | 53.4% | 61.1% | 46.8% | 62.5% | 40.3% | 2008 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 57.2% | 63.7% | 44.9% | 52.2% | 9.5% | 55.6% | 28.6% |
| 25 | 2003 | 49/50 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 63.0% | 46.4% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 56.0% | 41.6% | 2009 | 1/1 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 59.4% | 71.9% | 56.4% | 57.1% | 66.7% | 65.6% | 27.8% |
| 26 | 2004 | 46/47 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 62.0% | 66.7% | 46.3% | 53.7% | 44.2% | 58.9% | 38.0% | 2010 | 13/13 | 7.8 | 4.9 | 55.7% | 72.2% | 44.7% | 54.0% | 43.2% | 60.4% | 27.7% |
| 27 | 2005 | 24/24 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 60.7% | 61.7% | 45.0% | 48.8% | 50.5% | 55.1% | 36.9% | 2011 | 5/5 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 54.2% | 71.1% | 53.3% | 49.0% | 35.0% | 63.1% | 35.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21/21 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 59.7% | 76.4% | 50.5% | 60.5% | 45.2% | 65.7% | 31.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22/22 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 60.0% | 70.5% | 47.5% | 54.6% | 36.5% | 61.3% | 31.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2/2 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 52.0% | 73.6% | 44.1% | 47.9% | 15.0% | 59.2% | 29.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 48.8% | 79.5% | 43.9% | 75.0% | 33.3% | 61.3% | 29.0% |
| Career | — | 195/206 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 61.1% | 64.6% | 47.9% | 54.4% | 45.9% | 58.0% | 39.8% | — | 78/78 | 7.4 | 3.6 | 58.1% | 71.7% | 47.9% | 55.5% | 39.1% | 61.7% | 31.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | David Sanchez | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1997 | 1485 | 100.6 | -0.51 | -1.79 | 0.822 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1471 | 104.6 | -2.05 | -2.35 | 0.668 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2004 | 1478 | 104.1 | -0.13 | -2.62 | 0.778 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1459 | 100.5 | +1.82 | -0.89 | 0.731 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1520 | 112.3 | -1.67 | +2.95 | 1.115 | 52.6% | — | +50 | — | 43.8% | -0.25 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.14 | 2006 | 1507 | 110.8 | +0.85 | -1.37 | 0.993 | 50.1% | — | +39 | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1569 | 122.4 | -2.13 | +0.89 | 0.950 | 49.3% | -119 | +88 | — | 36.8% | -0.53 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.9 | +0.08 | 2007 | 1541 | 111.9 | -0.66 | -0.96 | 0.841 | 47.0% | — | +24 | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.33 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1634 | 136.6 | +0.29 | +1.36 | 1.077 | 51.3% | -252 | +126 | — | 49.5% | +0.31 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.3 | +0.51 | 2008 | 1514 | 102.9 | -0.59 | -3.68 | 0.644 | 43.1% | — | +58 | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1623 | 130.4 | -4.92 | +3.22 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -236 | +146 | — | 46.6% | -0.31 | 10–8 (56%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.5 | +0.42 | 2009 | 1517 | 108.0 | +0.26 | -4.12 | 0.808 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1574 | 133.1 | -3.41 | +1.28 | 0.923 | 48.4% | -117 | +123 | — | 43.9% | -0.35 | 6–10 (38%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.1 | -0.88 | 2010 | 1431 | 114.5 | -2.53 | -4.94 | 0.699 | 45.0% | +3 | +75 | +146 | 24.2% | -1.30 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | 91.5 | -0.12 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1597 | 119.1 | -5.12 | -2.04 | 0.822 | 46.3% | -167 | +77 | — | 39.7% | -0.87 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.3 | +0.21 | 2011 | 1440 | 111.8 | -1.03 | -2.02 | 0.965 | 50.0% | +12 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.61 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.44 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1489 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1776 | 134.8 | +1.94 | -2.48 | 0.909 | 49.2% | -91 | — | -65 | 43.6% | -0.42 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–6 (45%) | 105.3 | +0.18 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1660 | 121.7 | -1.71 | -4.21 | 0.811 | 46.8% | +17 | -131 | -26 | 31.0% | -1.26 | 3–6 (33%) | 8–7 (53%) | 97.5 | +0.21 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1668 | 119.8 | -0.92 | -3.23 | 0.723 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1656 | 105.5 | -4.72 | -0.33 | 0.748 | 46.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1633 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1719 | 132.7 | -3.01 | +1.32 | 0.948 | 49.0% | -180 | +114 | — | 43.2% | -0.35 | 27–33 (45%) | 24–31 (44%) | 99.3 | +0.27 | — | 1783 | 122.9 | -0.54 | -3.28 | 0.825 | 47.3% | -24 | +10 | +3 | 31.8% | -1.04 | 9–18 (33%) | 16–24 (40%) | 93.1 | +0.24 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaston Gaudio | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 23, 2005 | H2H |
| Jose Acasuso | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Christophe Rochus | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 28, 2014 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 21, 2014 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 26, 2014 | H2H |
| Horacio Zeballos | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 26, 2013 | H2H |