H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
David Sanchez vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
David Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2004 Amersfoort third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-4 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| David Sanchez | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |