H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

David Wheaton vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 1-2

Anders Jarryd holds a 2–1 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anders Jarryd leads 2–0 on carpet, while David Wheaton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anders Jarryd won the 1994 Beijing fourth round 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Anders Jarryd
SWE Age 65 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 1994* Beijing ATP 250 R16 Carpet Anders Jarryd #138 5-7 6-3 6-1 David Wheaton #38 Match data
Jun 15, 1991* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass David Wheaton #25 6-3 6-4 Anders Jarryd #34 Match data
Nov 9, 1990* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Anders Jarryd #111 6-3 7-5 David Wheaton #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Anders Jarryd #1,316 #5 957 2,059 371 251 59.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Anders Jarryd
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% #182 1,515 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0 1981 11–12 47.8% #100 1,651 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1982 20–13 60.6% #58 1,749 0 2
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1 1983 35–20 63.6% #19 1,876 0 2
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2 1984 46–18 71.9% #6 1,989 0 4
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2 1985 51–20 71.8% #8 1,982 0 5
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1986 31–14 68.9% #19 1,883 0 6
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3 1987 39–19 67.2% #15 1,957 0 6
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1988 23–13 63.9% #32 1,820 0 6
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1989 22–15 59.5% #31 1,803 0 6
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3 1990 14–13 51.9% #73 1,807 0 7
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3 1991 26–21 55.3% #47 1,763 0 7
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3 1992 11–17 39.3% #150 1,593 0 7
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3 1993 15–18 45.5% #67 1,624 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1994 12–12 50.0% #106 1,653 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 1995 13–17 43.3% #124 1,643 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 1996 1–8 11.1% #410 1,528 0 8