H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 1-1

David Wheaton and Andrea Gaudenzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1995 Sydney International round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #24 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #41 Match data Jan 12, 1995* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
David Wheaton #36 6-2 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #24 Match data Nov 2, 1994* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
18 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.33
20 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.78
21 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.04
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.03
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.16
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.21
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.59
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.05
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) — -2.07
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.26
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.